Alchemy Design System
The absence of a design system left 70+ internal apps non-compliant with WCAG and visually fragmented, eroding operator efficiency and brand trust.
The Problem
Alchemy’s fledgling Figma library was incomplete and off-brand, the website felt dated, and no clear path existed for designers to contribute. Leadership asked me to fill that gap as the first dedicated designer on an eight-engineer team.
My Mandate
- Rebuild the Figma design-system library from the ground up.
- Define the Alchemy brand (logo, voice, visual language) and refresh the marketing site.
- Create a contribution and onboarding model that scales to dozens of designers.
What I Actually Found
Library debt
Core components were detached, inconsistent, and mis-aligned with Alchemy’s product vision.
Underestimated scope
Branding and website work required foundational strategy—identity, audience, messaging—not just pixels.
Collaboration hurdles
Designers across five product spaces had different workflows and skill levels.
Strategy & Execution
| Pillar | Key Moves |
|---|---|
| Design-System Rebuild |
• Re-architected the library with atomic components, tokens, and naming conventions. • Paired with a Junior Designer; codified our learnings into a public “Design-System Guide.” |
| Brand & Website |
• Led discovery workshops to define identity, audience, and messaging. • Shipped a new logo, theme, and quick-win visual updates that earned rave reviews. |
| Contribution Model |
• Standardized Figma Branches as a federated workflow. • Authored a step-by-step contribution guide and mentored the first successful branch (Topbar component) into the global library. |
What is next
Finalize brand roll-out (logo lock-ups, color tokens, website CMS hand-off).
Automate component health reporting to track adoption and debt.
Continue refining the contribution flow as more teams onboard.
Key Takeaway
By pairing evidence-driven interviews with a rigorous governance model, I transformed a fragmented UI landscape into a scalable system that boosted accessibility by 32 points and cut engineering effort by nearly a quarter—all while up-skilling the team and aligning executives on a single, measurable vision of product quality.
| KPI | Before | After | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accessibility score (axe-core) | 65% | 97% | +32 pp |
| Average feature build time | 5.1 days | 3.9 days | -24% |
| Duplicate CSS/JS per app | 14k lines | 4k lines | -71% |
| Designer onboarding time | 2 weeks | 3 days | -78% |
User Journey
| STAGES | Discovery & Alignment | System Creation | Contribution Setup | Documentation & Rollout | Adoption & Maintenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOUCHPOINTS |
|
|
|
|
|
| ACTIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
| Thinking |
|
|
|
|
|
| Feeling |
|
|
|
|
|
| Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
| OPPORTUNITIES |
|
|
|
|
|